Benefit Profiling: The Golden Thread to Public Value in Government Programmes

Executive Summary

Maintaining the Golden Thread: Benefit Profiling ensures a “golden thread” from project outputs through outcomes to strategic benefits, aligning every initiative with organisational goals . This clear line of sight keeps programmes focused on delivering true public value rather than just outputs.

Transparency & Accountability: By defining and measuring benefits, public-sector programmes demonstrate value for money and enable greater accountability for taxpayer-funded investments. Visible benefit metrics build public trust and make it easier to justify or course-correct investments.

Current Challenges: Despite guidance, many government projects struggle with benefit realisation. In 2019, only 8% of major project spending had robust impact evaluation plans, while 64% had no evaluation at all . Recent improvements (63% of major projects now have evaluation plans, with 34% deemed high-quality ) show progress, but significant gaps remain in tracking outcomes and benefits post-delivery.

Co-Lab’s Solution & ROI: Co-Lab integrates Benefit Profiling and ROI-focused management systems into programme delivery. Using dashboards and scorecards, Co-Lab helps clients monitor performance from inception through to operation, linking each project’s outputs to tangible outcomes. Co-Lab’s case studies demonstrate that this approach not only identifies benefits early but also drives higher ROI by enabling proactive benefits management throughout the project lifecycle.

Benefit Profiling is no longer optional – it is essential for public programmes seeking to maximise impact, ensure accountability, and deliver lasting value. A graphical dashboard (see Figure 1) can illustrate how outputs map to outcomes and benefits in real time, providing a clear at-a-glance view for decision-makers.

Introduction

Public-sector organisations today face intense pressure to deliver results and demonstrate value. Whether it’s a digital transformation in the NHS or a major transport infrastructure build, taxpayers and oversight bodies expect to see tangible benefits for every pound spent. Too often, projects are deemed “successful” when they finish on time and budget, yet nobody asks: did this project actually achieve its intended outcomes and benefits?

This is where Benefit Profiling comes in. Benefit Profiling is the disciplined practice of defining, quantifying, and tracking the benefits a programme is expected to deliver. Instead of treating benefits as an afterthought, it embeds benefit thinking from day one – linking each project output (the deliverables) to the desired outcomes (the changes or results of using those deliverables) and ultimately to the strategic benefits (the long-term public value or improvements aligned to policy goals). In essence, it creates a continuous “golden thread” of alignment from the ground-level project activities up to the government’s highest strategic objectives.

Critically, Benefit Profiling in government programmes supports transparency and accountability. By clearly mapping how an investment leads to specific outcomes, officials can justify funding decisions, and citizens can see how public money is making a difference. This practice aligns with the UK government’s renewed focus on outcomes and value. The Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) and HM Treasury have emphasised the need for an “outcome-focused and more accountable approach” to major projects. High-quality evaluation and benefits tracking are no longer “nice-to-haves” – they are fundamental for ensuring best value for money and learning what works.

The Golden Thread: Linking Outputs to Outcomes and Benefits

Every successful improvement programme needs a strategic narrative – a way to connect day-to-day efforts with big-picture goals. The “golden thread” is that narrative. It ensures that every action and output is traceable to an outcome and a benefit that matters. In practical terms, maintaining the golden thread means if you pick any deliverable in a programme (for example, a new IT system or a training course), you can trace how it will lead to an outcome (such as faster service delivery or improved skills) which in turn contributes to a strategic benefit (such as higher satisfaction or economic growth).

Maintaining this alignment is challenging but crucial. A recent industry analysis noted that “maintaining the ‘Golden Thread’ – the ability to translate corporate strategies into specific targeted benefits for programmes to investors, shareholders and funders that their commitment and investment has been worthwhile”. In the public sector context, those investors and funders are taxpayers and government stakeholders. They need to see that projects haven’t lost sight of the promised benefits amidst the complexity of delivery.

A benefits-led approach prevents “benefits drift”, where teams focus so much on delivering outputs (on time, on budget) that they lose track of the original purpose.

By continuously referring back to the golden thread, programme managers can ask at each milestone: Are we still delivering the intended outcomes? If not, they can adjust course. This approach encourages a culture of purposeful delivery, not just task completion.

Benefit Mapping:

A practical tool to support the golden thread is benefit mapping. This involves visual mapping of how project outputs lead to intermediate outcomes and ultimately to benefits and strategic objectives. For example, a benefit map might show that a new digital portal (output) leads to faster processing times (outcome), which leads to improved public satisfaction and cost savings (benefits), aligning to the strategic objective of a “Modern and Efficient Public Service.” Such maps or logic models make the causal links explicit and testable.

In summary, the golden thread concept ensures clarity of purpose. It galvanizes all stakeholders around outcome-driven thinking – from project teams on the ground to senior executives setting strategy. When well-implemented, it becomes a cultural mindset: every project action must contribute to a real benefit, or else why are we doing it?

Transparency, Value for Money and Public Accountability

Public-sector programmes must not only deliver benefits – they must prove it. Transparency in reporting outcomes is essential to uphold accountability to Parliament and the public. The National Audit Office (NAO) has repeatedly stressed that without credible benefit tracking, it’s impossible to tell whether a project ultimately represented value for money. High-quality evaluation provides evidence of “what works” and shines a light on the value a project has produced, or if it hasn’t delivered as expected

Value for Money (VfM):

In government terms, a project delivers value for money when the benefits justify the costs. Benefit Profiling is key to demonstrating VfM. By attaching metrics (like economic gains, social outcomes, efficiency improvements) to each benefit, officials can perform cost–benefit analysis and benefit– cost ratios at approval stages and post-implementation. For example, if a £10 million skills programme delivers an increase in local employment (a benefit) valued at £50 million in economic activity, that 5:1 return should be clearly documented and reported. Conversely, if benefits fall short, that should be transparent too, prompting accountability and lesson-learning.

Accountability:

Structured benefit reporting builds a clear chain of accountability from project teams to ministers. Each benefit should have an owner—typically a senior responsible officer—accountable for its delivery. Regular reviews can feed into governance boards or public reports, reflecting a public-sector version of private ROI practices. The Government Major Projects Portfolio (GMPP) now includes expected benefits in its annual reports, signaling a shift toward greater transparency. The latest IPA report covers 227 major projects with a total cost of £834 billion and £719 billion in forecasted benefits. It also highlights challenges in monetising benefits—especially in defense and transformation projects—while noting ongoing efforts to improve benefit articulation across departments. Publicly acknowledging these challenges is a positive step toward openness.

Performance Reporting:

Transparent benefit profiling feeds into performance dashboards that can be shared with oversight bodies and even the public. Imagine an interactive online dashboard for a large infrastructure programme showing key benefits (e.g. travel time saved, carbon emissions reduced, jobs created) updated as the project progresses – this is increasingly feasible with today’s data tools. Such openness not only builds trust but also invites constructive scrutiny. In an age of open data, citizens expect to see the impact of public spending.

Accountability in Practice:

The NAO and Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee have called for stronger post-project evaluations – effectively a “Gate 6” review focused on whether promised benefits were delivered.

Currently, as the Committee observed, departments have few incentives to carry out such evaluations, since historically only a small fraction of major project spend was ever checked for outcomes . This is changing, with the Treasury’s new Evaluation Task Force, there is momentum to embed evaluation as a “must do” for all major projects . Benefit Profiling provides the foundational data for these evaluations, ensuring that when auditors ask “Did it work?”, the programme team isn’t scrambling to establish metrics after the fact – the metrics were built in from the start.

In summary, transparency and accountability are not just bureaucratic ideals; they have real implications for public trust and effective governance. Benefit Profiling equips public organisations with the information and evidence they need to answer the fundamental question: are we delivering what we promised? A rigorous approach to benefits is how we justify investments, learn from failures, and replicate successes – ultimately creating a culture of continual improvement in the public sector.

The Challenge: Gaps in Benefit Realisation and Performance

Despite clear advantages, effective benefit realisation remains a work in progress across many government programmes. Various studies and audits have highlighted persistent challenges:

Lack of Post-Project Follow-Through:

Traditionally, once a project is delivered, teams disband and focus shifts elsewhere – meaning benefits may or may not be tracked. The NAO observed that “government does not routinely look at what happens after major projects are completed.” In other words, too many initiatives are flying blind after launch, with no one measuring whether outcomes materialise in the years that follow. This gap can lead to missed opportunities (benefits that could be enhanced) or unreported under-performance (benefits that quietly fail to materialise).

Low Prevalence of Formal Evaluation:

As noted earlier, a 2019 analysis found only 8% of major project spending had robust impact evaluation plans, and fully 64% of spending had no evaluation arrangements at all . This is a stark indicator that benefit measurement was often neglected. While there has been improvement (by 2025, 63% of major projects have at least some form of evaluation plan ), this still implies that over one-third of major initiatives lack any systematic evaluation of outcomes. Moreover, only about one-third have a high-quality evaluation in place. In plain terms, many programmes still do not robustly track their success criteria.

Cultural and Incentive Barriers:

Why do these gaps persist? The Public Accounts Committee in 2022 pointed to a “lack of political engagement and a lack of incentives” for departments to produce evaluations . There can be a bias toward launching new projects rather than rigorously reviewing past ones. Benefit realisation management often falls into a no-man’s land of responsibility – is it the project team’s job (who may have moved on), or the business owner’s job, or an evaluation unit’s job? Without clear accountability (one of the very things Benefit Profiling seeks to establish), benefits can slip through the cracks.

Benefits Drift and Erosion:

Earlier we discussed benefits drift – losing focus on intended benefits during delivery. This challenge is real: initial business cases often list an ambitious array of benefits, but as projects encounter delays or scope changes, some benefits are quietly dropped or diminished. Without a firm Benefit Profiling discipline, there is a risk that by the end, a project delivers only a fraction of the originally anticipated value. Stakeholders may not even be aware of what was lost along the way if changes aren’t documented. This erodes the overall return on investment for the programme and can breed cynicism in stakeholders if the grand promises at the outset don’t match the reality at the end.

---

These challenges underline why Benefit Profiling and robust benefits management are so important. It’s not that public-sector leaders lack the will to achieve outcomes – it’s that the systems and practices haven’t consistently supported outcome-focused thinking. The good news is that with frameworks now available (HM Treasury’s Green Book guidance on appraisal, the upcoming “Teal Book” on delivery guidance for value/benefits, IPA’s 2017 Guide for Effective Benefits Management in Major Projects), there is a growing toolkit for agencies to draw on . The task at hand is to operationalize these frameworks – to bake benefit realisation into the DNA of programme delivery.

In the next section, we look at how Co-Lab approaches this task, and how a focused strategy on Benefit Profiling can turn these challenges into opportunities for significantly improved programme performance and ROI.

Co-Lab’s Approach

Integrating Benefit Profiling with ROI Management

Co-Lab’s philosophy is that every programme can unlock greater value through disciplined benefit management. In our experience working with government agencies and public-sector organisations, we’ve developed a suite of tools and practices that put Benefit Profiling at the heart of programme management. This approach not only guards the golden thread – it actively uses it to drive decision-making and maximise return on investment.

Integrating Benefit Profiling with ROI Management

Public-sector programmes must not only deliver benefits – they must prove it. Transparency in reporting outcomes is essential to uphold accountability to Parliament and the public. The National Audit Office (NAO) has repeatedly stressed that without credible benefit tracking, it’s impossible to tell whether a project ultimately represented value for money. High-quality evaluation provides evidence of “what works” and shines a light on the value a project has produced, or if it hasn’t delivered as expected

Early Definition of Benefits (Benefit Profiles):

Co-Lab starts by helping clients clearly define each expected benefit in a Benefit Profile document. A Benefit Profile captures specific information: a description of the benefit, how it will be measured (KPIs or metrics), the baseline value (current state), the target value, the owner responsible for realizing it, timeline for realisation, and any dependencies or assumptions. By completing benefit profiles during the business case stage, we ensure that from the get go, there is a shared understanding of what success looks like. This process often challenges teams to refine project scope – if an activity doesn’t lead to a defined benefit, why are we doing it? Conversely, it may uncover additional benefits or synergies between projects.

Benefits Mapping and the Programme Logic:

Leveraging techniques like logic models and outcome mapping, Co-Lab consultants work with client stakeholders to create a visual Benefits Map for the programme. This map lays out the cause-and-effect linkages: “Project A will deliver X output, which enables Y outcome, contributing to Z benefit.” The mapping exercise itself brings different departments and experts together, creating alignment. It serves as a living reference throughout the project. When changes occur, the team updates the map, so the golden thread is never lost. This practice reflects best-practice MSP (Managing Successful Programmes) methodology – essentially ensuring that all roads lead to strategic objectives

Performance Measurement and Dashboards:

Co-Lab places a strong emphasis on measuring results and making them visible. We help clients develop performance scorecards and live dashboards tailored to their programme. These dashboards typically include a mix of output metrics (e.g. deliverables completed, milestones met), outcome indicators (e.g. service levels, uptake rates, response times), and benefit KPIs (e.g. savings achieved, revenue generated, satisfaction scores, social value delivered). By tracking these in real time (or at regular reporting intervals), the programme management office can spot early if a benefit is off-track. For instance, if a benefit profile expected a 10% reduction in processing time by Q3 and the dashboard shows only 2% reduction by mid-Q3, it’s a flag to investigate and take corrective action. Transparency is internal as well – these dashboards ensure everyone from project managers to senior sponsors has a single source of truth on progress.

Fig2 - Dashboard for Benefits Management

Benefits Realisation Governance:

We support clients in establishing governance structures that keep benefits in focus. This might mean forming a Benefits Realisation Board or integrating benefits discussions into existing steering committees. Key benefit owners present updates on their benefits, using the data from the dashboards and profiles. By formalizing this, organisations create accountability loops – there is a forum where unmet benefits are questioned and addressed, and successful benefits are recognized (and potentially used as benchmarks for other projects). We often tie this into the project lifecycle: for example, making it a requirement that a Benefits Realisation Plan is approved at project kick-off, and that a post implementation benefit review is conducted at set intervals (e.g. 6, 12, 24 months after go-live).

Iterative Course Correction (Agile Benefits Management):

One advantage of continuous benefit tracking is the ability to adapt. Co-Lab encourages an agile approach to benefits – if a planned benefit is not materializing, we work with the client to diagnose why. Maybe assumptions have changed or external conditions shifted. We then explore adjustments: can the programme be tweaked to enhance that benefit? Or should resources be reallocated to higher-impact areas? In one case study (as detailed in Co-Lab’s Realising Benefits case study), a public-sector transformation programme initially over-estimated a certain benefit of a new system. When early dashboard data showed the uptake was low, Co-Lab helped the client implement a mid-course corrective action: additional training and communications were rolled out to boost usage of the system. This led to a recovery in benefits trajectory, and the programme ultimately achieved its target ROI within the planned timeframe. Such proactive interventions are only possible when benefits data is being tracked and acted upon.

Demonstrating ROI:

Co-Lab views ROI as a holistic measure of public value—not just financial returns, but also social and environmental impact. We translate these into meaningful indicators and integrate them into a benefits dashboard, giving clients a dynamic view of a programme’s value. For instance, a £5m regeneration project might yield £15m in land value and economic activity within two years (a 3:1 ROI), alongside gains in community well-being. Visual summaries like benefit charts help communicate this clearly. Our pitch deck showcases success stories where clients exceeded initial ROI projections by systematically tracking and realising benefits across the project lifecycle.

---

Co-Lab’s integrated methodology ensures that Benefit Profiling is not a one-time exercise but a continuous discipline. By combining strategy (golden thread alignment), technology (dashboards and data analytics), and governance (clear roles and review processes), we embed a benefits-focused culture in programme teams. The result is a virtuous cycle: greater transparency → better decision-making → improved outcomes → higher ROI.

Our public-sector clients not only meet their targets more reliably; they also create auditable evidence of success that can be celebrated with the public or scrutinized confidently by oversight entities

Conclusion and Call to Action

In an era of tight budgets and high public expectations, simply delivering projects is not enough – delivering benefits is what counts. Benefit Profiling offers public-sector leaders a powerful approach to ensure that every programme and project remains anchored to the outcomes that matter most. It provides the golden thread that ties strategic intent to on-the-ground results, ensuring no investment loses sight of its purpose. It also instills a level of transparency and accountability that is increasingly demanded in modern governance.

This white paper has outlined how Benefit Profiling, underpinned by Co-Lab’s proven frameworks, can transform the way government initiatives are executed and evaluated. By embracing clear benefit definitions, robust tracking tools, and a culture of continuous evaluation, public organisations can avoid the common pitfalls of benefit drift and opacity. Instead, they can build a legacy of value – programmes that not only finish on time and on budget, but also fulfill their promises to citizens.

Conclusion and Call to Action

For public-sector executives and programme managers reading this, the call to action is clear:

Make benefits the starting point: Insist on benefit profiles and outcome metrics in every business case and project charter. Ask your teams early, “What will success look like in terms of public value, and how will we measure it?”

Invest in the right tools and expertise: 
Equip your organisation with the dashboards, data systems, and training needed to track benefits effectively. If you lack internal capacity, consider partnering with specialists who can jump-start your benefits management capability.

Embed benefits in governance: 
Elevate benefit realisation to a standing agenda item in programme reviews. Celebrate benefit wins and rigorously investigate shortfalls. Create incentives for teams to think beyond outputs towards sustained outcomes.

Stay transparent: 
Publish your programme benefits and outcomes in annual reports or public dashboards. Not only does this fulfill accountability; it also builds trust and can rally support for your initiatives when people see real-world impacts.

---

Co-Lab is ready to support public-sector organisations on this journey. With our blend of strategic insight and hands-on implementation experience, we help clients bridge the gap between ambitious plans and measurable results. Our approach is collaborative – acting as your “virtual strategy team” – and tailored to your context, ensuring solutions are practical and owned by your people.

In Closing

The importance of Benefit Profiling cannot be overstated. It is the linchpin for driving improvement and delivery in government programmes. By implementing the ideas discussed in this paper, public-sector leaders can ensure that every project not only works but makes a difference. That is the true measure of success in public service delivery.

Let’s strengthen that golden thread and, in doing so, weave a future where taxpayer-funded programmes consistently translate into tangible, positive outcomes for society. Now is the time to turn commitment into action – and

Co-Lab is here to help you realise those benefits, every step of the way.

Contact Co-Lab to learn more about our Benefit Management systems, request a demo of our benefits dashboard, or discuss how we can tailor a benefit realisation strategy for your upcoming programme.

Together, we can ensure your next initiative sets a new benchmark for transparency, accountability, and value.

Download PDF